Alabama maintains statutory medical malpractice damage caps under the Alabama Medical Liability Act, but their enforcement is limited by constitutional precedent. The Alabama Supreme Court struck down noneconomic caps in 1991 and upheld punitive damage limits in 2023.
This framework reflects Alabama’s strong constitutional protections for jury trial rights and equal protection. Given existing precedent, a 2024 proposal to reinstate noneconomic damage caps represented the first major reform effort in more than three decades, but the cap remains unenforceable under current constitutional rulings.
This article reviews Alabama’s malpractice cap statutes, key precedents, legislative updates, and procedural rules governing medical liability actions.
Legal Framework in Alabama
Alabama’s medical malpractice damage framework derives statutory authority from the Alabama Medical Liability Act, enacted to standardize healthcare liability actions across the state. The primary provisions appear in Alabama Code Title 6, Chapter 5, which collectively govern professional negligence claims and related procedural requirements.
- Ala. Code § 6-5-544 initially established a $400,000 limit on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice actions. However, this cap was later declared unconstitutional by the Alabama Supreme Court.
- Ala. Code § 6-11-21 punitive damages are limited, which caps awards at three times compensatory damages or $1.5 million, whichever is greater.
- Ala. Code § 6-5-548 defines expert witness qualification standards, requiring testimony from “similarly situated health care providers” practicing in the same or a substantially similar field.
The framework operates within constitutional constraints that limit the enforcement of Alabama’s noneconomic damage cap. State constitutional protections for jury trial rights, equal treatment, and separation of powers have consistently restricted the legislature’s ability to impose strict limits on malpractice recoveries.
2025 Alabama Medical Malpractice Caps
Alabama’s malpractice framework includes statutory limits, but constitutional precedent renders these provisions unenforceable following Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association. Punitive damage limits remain enforceable under Ala. Code § 6-11-21.
Although these limits appear in the Alabama Medical Liability Act, they are dormant and have no legal effect under current precedent. The following reflects the original statutory framework rather than active, enforceable caps.
Current Statutory References (Unenforceable):
- Total Judgment Cap: Originally set at $1,034,000, adjusted annually for inflation and published by the Alabama Administrative Office of Courts. This cap is not currently enforceable.
- Economic Damages: No statutory limit, though total recovery remains subject to the overall judgment ceiling.
- Punitive Damages: Governed by Ala. Code § 6-11-21, which caps awards at the greater of three times compensatory damages or $1,500,000 for cases with physical injury, or $500,000 for cases without.
Cap Application Structure:
- Per Incident Basis: Single aggregate limit regardless of the number of plaintiffs or defendants.
- Noneconomic Only: Applies solely to nonpecuniary losses such as pain and suffering.
- Total Recovery Limitation: Historic provision under § 6-5-547 (struck down as unconstitutional).
Publication and Adjustment: Formerly issued by the Alabama Administrative Office of Courts under § 6-5-547; these updates are no longer applicable.
Recent Developments & Pending Legislation
House Bill 420 represents the most significant legislative development in Alabama medical malpractice law since the 1991 Moore decision. Introduced on April 4, 2024, by Representatives Faulkner, Colvin, and Kirkland, HB420 proposed comprehensive tort reform, including:
- New definitions and caps on noneconomic damages in personal injury and medical malpractice cases.
- Regulations on proof and recovery of medical expenses in litigation.
- Limitations on litigation financing arrangements and required court disclosures.
- Modified expert testimony admissibility requirements.
Senate Bill 293 was simultaneously introduced on the same date, suggesting a coordinated legislative strategy between chambers. Both bills remain pending in their respective Judiciary Committees without reported advancement to floor votes or final disposition.
These bills mark the first major attempt since Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association to reestablish statutory noneconomic damage caps. Future enactment would likely prompt immediate constitutional challenges based on the precedents established in Moore and related Alabama Supreme Court decisions.
Key Alabama Medical Malpractice Court Precedents
Alabama’s medical malpractice damage framework is defined by Supreme Court decisions that struck down statutory caps and established controlling constitutional precedent governing jury authority and legislative limits on damages.
Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association — Constitutional Prohibition of Damage Caps
Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association held that statutory caps on noneconomic damages violate multiple provisions of the Alabama Constitution. The case involved a patient who suffered third-degree burns and a finger amputation following an improper medication injection, with a $600,000 jury award reduced to $400,000 under the statutory cap.
The Alabama Supreme Court held that Ala. Code § 6-5-544(b) violated the Right to Trial by Jury (Art. I, § 11) by substituting legislative judgment for jury determinations, Equal Protection (Art. I, § 6) by creating arbitrary classifications without rational basis, the Open Courts Clause (Art. I, § 13), and Separation of Powers principles by intruding on judicial review authority.
The Court described the statute as “unreasonable class legislation” that failed constitutional scrutiny, establishing Alabama’s position that jury verdicts in malpractice cases must be respected absent traditional common-law grounds for remittitur.
Smith v. Schulte — Extension to Punitive Damages
Smith v. Schulte extended the constitutional analysis established in Moore to punitive damage limits in medical malpractice actions. The Alabama Supreme Court invalidated Ala. Code § 6-5-547, which had imposed a $1 million cap on punitive damages, applying the same reasoning that legislative caps violate state constitutional guarantees of jury authority and equal protection.
The Court held that punitive limits substitute legislative judgment for the jury’s role in assessing punishment and deterrence, reinforcing that Alabama’s Constitution creates comprehensive barriers to statutory interference with damage awards.
Together with Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association, this decision confirms that Alabama courts consistently strike down damages caps as unconstitutional intrusions on jury function and equal treatment under law.
Procedural Rules for Filing Malpractice Claims in Alabama
Alabama medical malpractice actions are governed by specific procedural requirements under the Alabama Medical Liability Act. These rules establish filing deadlines, expert qualifications, and strict pleading standards for all claims.
No Pre-Suit Notice Requirement:
- Alabama does not require pre-suit notice or certificates of merit.
- Plaintiffs may file complaints without advance written notice or expert affidavits at the outset of litigation.
Statute of Limitations and Repose:
- Two years from the date of the alleged act or omission.
- Six-month extension if the injury is discovered or could reasonably have been discovered later.
- Absolute four-year statute of repose regardless of discovery.
- For minors under four years old, actions may be filed until the child’s eighth birthday.
Expert Witness Qualification:
- Experts must be “similarly situated health care providers.”
- Must share the same professional licensure, comparable training and experience, and, if applicable, the same board certification.
- Must have practiced in the same specialty for at least one year immediately preceding the alleged breach.
Detailed Pleading Requirements:
- Complaints must include specific factual descriptions of each alleged act or omission.
- Claims not specifically pleaded are privileged from discovery.
- This rule effectively requires a comprehensive pre-filing investigation and prohibits using discovery to develop unpled theories of liability.
Navigating Alabama’s Malpractice Caps
Alabama’s malpractice framework defines clear statutory parameters but operates under constitutional precedent that invalidates caps on noneconomic damages. The Moore and Smith decisions remain controlling, while strict procedural standards under §§ 6-5-548 and 6-5-551 govern malpractice litigation.
Comprehensive case documentation and expert validation remain central to defensible practice under Alabama’s Medical Liability Act. AI-powered legal tools can accelerate medical record organization, expert verification, and chronology preparation to maintain compliance and efficiency in complex cases.
To learn more about automated preparation for Alabama medical malpractice and personal injury cases, request a demo.
