Last Updated: August 29, 2026
For causes of action accruing in 2026, Nevada limits noneconomic damages in a professional negligence action to $590,000. That figure sits on a schedule of statutory medical malpractice damage caps that began with a 2004 voter initiative and has been upheld by the state's courts.
The controlling amount depends on the year the cause of action accrued, not the year of filing or trial. NRS Chapter 41A also fixes which providers fall inside the cap and which procedural requirements attach to a claim.
This article covers Nevada's cap schedule, statutory exceptions, controlling court decisions, and procedural rules for professional negligence claims.
Nevada's Legal Framework for Professional Negligence Claims
NRS Chapter 41A governs healthcare liability in Nevada. The caps trace to Ballot Question No. 3, a 2004 statewide initiative approved by 59.38% of votes cast.
- NRS 41A.035 sets the noneconomic damage limitation.
- NRS 41A.015 defines professional negligence as the "failure of a provider of health care, in rendering services, to use the reasonable care, skill or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and experienced providers of health care."
- NRS 41A.045 makes each defendant liable severally only, meaning for its own percentage of negligence rather than the whole judgment, abrogating joint and several liability in professional negligence actions.
NRS 41A.017 defines a "provider of health care" to cover licensed physicians, physician assistants, genetic counselors, anesthesiologist assistants, dentists, licensed nurses, dispensing opticians, optometrists, licensed physical therapists, podiatric physicians, licensed psychologists, behavioral health and wellness practitioners, chiropractic physicians, naprapaths, doctors of Oriental medicine, medical laboratory directors and technicians, and licensed dietitians. It also reaches licensed hospitals, clinics, surgery centers, physicians' professional corporations, and group practices employing any such person, along with their employees.
Liability may be direct or vicarious, the latter imposed on an entity for a practitioner's conduct. Staff privileges alone do not create it. Oehler v. Humana Inc., 105 Nev. 348 (1989), held that a hospital is not vicariously liable for physicians who are neither its employees nor its agents.
Assembly Bill 404 (2023) set the phased increase schedule that began January 1, 2024. NRS 41A.035(4) requires the Nevada Supreme Court to publish the maximum amount annually for the following 20 years.
2026 Nevada Medical Malpractice Caps
The noneconomic damage cap for causes of action accruing in 2026 is $590,000, the amount published annually by the Nevada Supreme Court under NRS 41A.035. The cap rises $80,000 each January 1 through 2028. Proven economic damages carry no ceiling.
- Accrual before January 1, 2024: $350,000
- 2024: $430,000
- 2025: $510,000
- 2026: $590,000
- 2027: $670,000
- 2028: $750,000
- 2029 onward: prior year plus 2.1%
The 2.1% figure in NRS 41A.035(3) is a flat statutory rate, not a Consumer Price Index adjustment.
Accrual Date and Cap Year
The increased amounts apply only to causes of action accruing on or after January 1, 2024; earlier accruals remain subject to the $350,000 cap. Filing date and trial date do not control. Both 2024 Nevada Supreme Court decisions discussed below applied the former figure for that reason.
No Nevada appellate decision has yet resolved a disputed cap year at the January 1, 2024 boundary.
Scope of the Aggregate Cap
A single cap applies per incident, "regardless of the number of plaintiffs, defendants or theories upon which liability may be based." Adding parties does not multiply it.
Loss of consortium falls inside the capped category. In wrongful death actions, one aggregate amount covers all heirs and the estate together.
Economic Damages Remain Uncapped
NRS 41A.007 defines economic damages to include "damages for medical treatment, care or custody, loss of earnings and loss of earning capacity." NRS 41A.011 covers the capped side: pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, disfigurement, and other nonpecuniary damages.
Punitive Damages Under NRS 42.005
Punitive awards remain available against health care providers on clear and convincing evidence of oppression, fraud, or malice. NRS 42.005 caps the award at three times compensatory damages when compensatory damages reach $100,000, and at $300,000 below that threshold.
The statute's categorical exceptions to that two-tier limit (defective products, insurer bad faith, discriminatory housing practices, certain hazardous-material conduct, and defamation) do not reach health care providers. NRS 41A.035 does not apply to punitive awards.
Government Providers and the $200,000 Cap
NRS 41.035 caps total tort recovery against the State, its political subdivisions, and their employees at $200,000 per claimant and bars punitive damages. Against a state-employed provider, that ceiling operates alongside the NRS 41A.035 cap and is ordinarily more restrictive.
Emergency Care and Attorney Fee Limits
NRS 41.503 limits recovery to $50,000 for qualifying good-faith emergency or trauma care, excluding post-stabilization and unrelated care.
NRS 7.095 caps attorney contingency fees at a flat 35% of the net recovery for causes of action accruing on or after October 1, 2023, replacing the former sliding scale.
Recent Developments and Pending Legislation
No Nevada legislation has amended NRS 41A.035 or the AB 404 increase schedule since 2023, and no constitutional challenge to the cap is pending. As of August 28, 2026, the 83rd Regular Session had adjourned June 3, 2025, and the 36th Special Session had concluded November 19, 2025.
Two 2025 enactments amended the NRS 41A.017 provider definition without touching the cap. Senate Bill 165 (Chapter 379, approved June 6, 2025) added behavioral health and wellness practitioners. Assembly Bill 248 (Chapter 120, approved May 29, 2025) ratified the Physical Therapy Licensure Compact; related 2025 legislation conformed the statute's reference from "registered" to "licensed" physical therapist without changing their coverage.
A 20% contingency-fee ballot initiative failed after the Nevada Supreme Court rejected its description of effect on January 27, 2025, and no noneconomic-cap question appears on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The three-year constitutional bar on amending initiative statutes has long since run, so the Legislature may amend the cap directly, as it did in 2015 and 2023.
Key Nevada Medical Malpractice Court Precedents
Nevada Supreme Court decisions have upheld the cap, fixed its application to multiple plaintiffs, extended it to vicariously liable entities, and placed emergency medical services outside Chapter 41A. The four below run from 2015 through 2026.
Tam v. Eighth Judicial District Court: Constitutional Validity
Tam v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 131 Nev. 792 (2015), upheld the cap against a challenge under the right to jury trial, reasoning that the limit operates only after the jury has assessed damages. The court held the cap applies per incident and, in the wrongful death posture before it, limited the heirs' and the estate's combined noneconomic damages to one aggregate amount.
The "regardless of the number of plaintiffs, defendants or theories" language the court construed was not in the 2004 initiative. Senate Bill 292 (2015) added it earlier that year.
Valley Health System LLC v. Murray: Fiduciary Duty and Cap Reduction
Valley Health System LLC v. Murray, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. 14 (2024), held that a hospital owes patients no fiduciary duty in relation to medical care and reversed a punitive award predicated on that duty. Applying the pre-AB 404 cap and the hospital's 65% several share, the court reduced its noneconomic damages to $227,500, alongside $1,105,000 in economic damages for loss of probable support.
Nevins v. Martyn: Vicariously Liable Entities
Nevins v. Martyn, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. 66 (October 17, 2024), held that professional entities are subject to the NRS 41A.035 cap when vicariously liable for a practitioner's negligence and cannot be held more liable than the practitioner. The en banc court affirmed reduction of a $3,153,600 pain-and-suffering award to $350,000.
RBR Management, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court: EMS Providers Outside Chapter 41A
RBR Management, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 44 (June 18, 2026), held that an emergency medical services provider is not a "provider of health care" under NRS 41A.017 and that an ambulance is not a clinic. Claims against EMS defendants fall outside Chapter 41A's cap and its procedural rules.
Procedural Rules for Filing Malpractice Claims in Nevada
Nevada professional negligence claims carry accrual-based limitation periods, an affidavit-of-merit requirement filed with the complaint, and fixed service and trial deadlines. Noncompliance generally results in dismissal.
Statute of Limitations (NRS 41A.097)
NRS 41A.097 sets the limitation periods by injury date.
- Injuries on or after October 1, 2023: 3 years after injury or 2 years after discovery, whichever comes first.
- Injuries October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2023: 3 years after injury or 1 year after discovery, whichever comes first.
- Tolling: during any period the provider conceals an act, error, or omission underlying the action.
- Minor children: brain damage or birth defect claims run until the child turns 10; sterility claims until 2 years after discovery.
AB 404 added the two-year discovery period, which reaches only injuries on or after October 1, 2023.
NRS 41A.071 Affidavit of Merit
NRS 41A.071 requires every complaint to be filed with an affidavit from a medical expert who practices or has practiced in a substantially similar area. The affidavit must support the allegations, identify each provider alleged to be negligent, and set forth the alleged acts of negligence separately as to each defendant. Filing without it requires dismissal without prejudice.
De Becker v. UHS of Delaware, Inc., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. 58 (2024), confirmed that a deficient affidavit cannot be cured by amendment. Engelson v. Dignity Health, 139 Nev. Adv. Op. 58 (Ct. App. 2023), held the affidavit need not address proximate causation.
Filing, Service, and Trial Deadlines
NRCP 4(e) requires service within 120 days after filing. NRS 41A.061 requires the action to be brought to trial within 3 years after filing, with mandatory dismissal absent good cause. NRS 41A.081 requires the parties, their attorneys, and insurers to participate in good faith in a settlement conference before a judge other than the one assigned.
A claim under NRS 41A.100(1) requires no affidavit. That subsection creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence, one the defendant must disprove, in five specified situations, including a foreign object left in the body. Filing an NRS 41A.071 affidavit or designating a standard-of-care expert forfeits the presumption.
Navigating Nevada's Malpractice Caps
NRS 41A.035 limits noneconomic damages by accrual year, while economic damages and, subject to NRS 42.005, punitive damages sit outside the Chapter 41A cap. Whether the $350,000 figure or a scheduled amount governs turns on the accrual date.
Accurate medical records and defensible medical chronologies fix treatment dates, which is what accrual-based caps and filing deadlines depend on.
To learn more, book a demo.
