Medical malpractice claims in Ohio are governed by a dual-deadline framework that combines a one-year statute of limitations with a four-year statute of repose. These timing rules strictly control when claims may be filed and operate within a broader system of state-specific filing deadlines that vary across jurisdictions.
This article explains Ohio’s medical malpractice statute of limitations framework, including how the one-year discovery rule applies, how the four-year statute of repose limits late-discovered claims, and how courts apply narrow tolling exceptions. It also places Ohio’s timing rules alongside nationwide punitive damage caps that affect claim exposure without altering filing deadlines.
Core Rules for the Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Ohio
Ohio Revised Code Section 2305.113 establishes a comprehensive framework governing medical malpractice filing deadlines through three critical components: the discovery rule, the statute of repose, and the "whichever occurs first" mechanism.
The Discovery Rule
Under ORC § 2305.113(a), medical malpractice actions must be commenced within one year after the cause of action accrues. Accrual occurs when the plaintiff:
- Discovers the resulting injury.
- In the exercise of reasonable care and diligence, it should have discovered the injury.
This discovery-based accrual applies to medical, dental, optometric, and chiropractic malpractice claims.
Four-Year Statute of Repose
Ohio imposes an absolute four-year statute of repose under ORC § 2305.113(c). No medical claim may be filed more than four years after the act or omission forming the basis of the claim.
Key characteristics of the statute of repose include:
- It runs from the date of the alleged medical negligence.
- It applies regardless of when the injury is discovered.
- It bars claims even when injuries are inherently undiscoverable.
The statute of repose operates independently of the discovery rule.
How the Deadlines Apply Together
Ohio’s medical malpractice framework requires compliance with both deadlines, with the earlier deadline controlling:
- If discovery occurs within three years of the medical error, the plaintiff has one year from discovery to file, provided the claim is filed within the four-year repose period.
- If discovery occurs between three and four years after the medical error, the one-year statute of limitations is shortened by the four-year repose deadline.
- If discovery occurs after four years, the claim is time-barred.
Medical Malpractice vs. Ordinary Negligence
Claims arising from medical diagnosis, care, or treatment are governed by Ohio’s medical malpractice timing rules. Ohio law identifies “medical claims” as actions against healthcare providers arising from professional medical services.
By contrast, ordinary negligence claims, such as premises liability at medical facilities, are governed by Ohio’s general two-year statute of limitations and are not subject to a statute of repose. This distinction can significantly affect filing deadlines depending on how a claim is characterized.
Tolling Exceptions That Affect the Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Ohio
Ohio applies a limited statutory tolling approach in medical malpractice cases. Only specific exceptions may suspend filing deadlines, and courts construe these provisions narrowly within the state’s dual-deadline framework.
1. Minority Tolling
Ohio law permits tolling for minors under certain circumstances. When applicable, tolling may suspend both the one-year statute of limitations and the four-year statute of repose until the disability is removed.
2. Mental Incapacity
Tolling may apply when a plaintiff is legally incapacitated and unable to manage legal affairs during the limitations period. This exception is applied restrictively and does not extend filing deadlines beyond statutory limits absent a qualifying incapacity.
3. Foreign Object Doctrine
Claims involving foreign objects unintentionally left in a patient’s body during medical treatment may qualify for a limited discovery-based extension. This exception applies only to objects wrongfully retained during a procedure and does not include devices or materials intentionally placed as part of medical care.
4. Absent Defendant
Ohio law permits tolling when a healthcare provider is absent from the state. This exception may suspend both the statute of limitations and the statute of repose while the provider remains outside Ohio.
5. Rejected Tolling Doctrines
Ohio does not recognize fraudulent concealment or continuous treatment as bases for tolling medical malpractice filing deadlines. Only the enumerated statutory exceptions apply.
How Ohio Courts Interpret Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations Rules
Four landmark Ohio Supreme Court decisions from 2016 to 2023 definitively clarify how courts apply medical malpractice timing rules in practice.
Antoon v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation — Discovery Rule Application
In Antoon v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation (2015), the Ohio Supreme Court held that the four-year statute of repose "is a true statute of repose, providing an absolute bar to any medical-claim action after four years have passed." The discovery rule does not apply to the statute of repose, which begins running from the date of the alleged medical error, regardless of when the injury was discovered.
Everhart v. Coshocton County Memorial Hospital — Statute of Repose Clarification
In Everhart v. Coshocton County Memorial Hospital (2023-Ohio-4670), the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that wrongful death claims arising from medical malpractice are subject to the four-year statute of repose under ORC § 2305.113(C), running from the date of the underlying medical error.
Wrongful death claims are also subject to a separate two-year statute of limitations from the date of death under ORC § 2125.02(F)(1). As derivative claims based on medical care, wrongful death claims must satisfy both timing requirements: they must be filed within two years of the decedent's death and within four years of the medical error, whichever period expires first.
These decisions confirm that Ohio's statute of repose operates as an absolute deadline with minimal exceptions, preventing circumvention through claim characterization or reliance on discovery-based timing.
Recent Updates to Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations Laws in Ohio
Ohio’s medical malpractice statute of limitations framework has not been amended legislatively in recent years. The one-year statute of limitations and four-year statute of repose under Ohio Revised Code § 2305.113 remain unchanged.
Recent Ohio Supreme Court decisions have clarified how these deadlines apply in practice, particularly by reinforcing the absolute nature of the statute of repose and confirming its application to wrongful death claims arising from medical care. These rulings confirm that filing deadlines cannot be extended through savings statutes or claim characterization and that tolling exceptions are narrowly applied.
No enacted legislation has modified Ohio’s medical malpractice filing deadlines during this period.
Meeting Medical Malpractice Filing Deadlines in Ohio
Ohio’s medical malpractice filing deadlines are governed by the interaction between the one-year statute of limitations and the four-year statute of repose. Claims must be filed within the applicable limitations period, but no later than four years after the alleged act or omission, regardless of when an injury is discovered.
Because accrual and discovery often depend on treatment timelines and when a causal connection becomes reasonably knowable, accurate medical documentation is essential. Clear treatment histories and organized timelines—such as a medical chronology—help clarify when claims accrue, while efficient medical record retrieval can identify gaps or delays that affect filing deadlines.
Explore Tavrn’s legal technology solutions.
.webp)
.webp)
